Quotes of the Day

cartoon

"..You know what happened to Nixon when he broke the law' --Columnist Helen Thomas nails Press Secretary McClellan (transcript at bottom of this page)

"The authorization for the use of force doesn't say anything about electronic surveillance, issue was never raised with the Congress" --GOP Senator Arlen Specter, head of the Judiciary Committee


Surveillance Net Yields Few Suspects

The more an intellegent person reads and listens, the more outrage and/or disbelief they feel, (depending on how one reacts). Bush has been spinning his unconstiutional spying on American citizens as "terrorist spying", yet as the Washington Post reports LESS THAN 10, YES, LESS THAN 10 U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF THOUSANDS TAPPED HAVE "AROUSED" ENOUGH SUSPICION TO JUSTIFY THE INTERCEPTION. That does not mean that these taps led to arrests and convictions. NO. Out of the THOUSANDS spied upon, only a morsel "aroused suspicion".

QUESTION: Where is Congress to protect our rights? Where are the Democrats to be so outraged that they are demanding investigations? Most importantly, where are we, the American People whose constitutional rights are being violated, where are we?


cartoon

NSA's Hunt for Terrorists Scrutinizes Thousands of Americans, but Most Are Later Cleared

Washington Post, February 5, 2006 Intelligence officers who eavesdropped on thousands of Americans in overseas calls under authority from President Bush have dismissed nearly all of them as potential suspects after hearing nothing pertinent to a terrorist threat, according to accounts from current and former government officials and private-sector sources with knowledge of the technologies in use. Fewer than 10 U.S. citizens or residents out of the thousands tapped a year, according to an authoritative account, have aroused enough suspicion during warrantless eavesdropping to justify interception of their domestic calls, as well.

...Officials conversant with the program said a far more common question for eavesdroppers is whether, not why, a terrorist plotter is on either end of the call. The answer, they said, is usually no.


More Allegations of Libby Lies Revealed

cartoon

Judge's Report Shows Cheney Aide Is Accused Of Broad Deception

Washington Post, February 4, 2006 The special prosecutor in the CIA leak case alleged that Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff was engaged in a broader web of deception than was previously known and repeatedly lied to conceal that he had been a key source for reporters about undercover operative Valerie Plame, according to court records released yesterday.

The court records show that Libby denied to a grand jury that he ever mentioned Plame or her CIA job to then-White House press secretary Ari Fleischer or then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller in separate conversations he had with each of them in early July 2003. The records also suggest that Libby did not disclose to investigators that he first spoke to Miller about Plame in June 2003, and that prosecutors learned of the nature of the conversation only when Miller finally testified late in the fall of 2005.


Columnist Helen Thomas nails Press Secretary McClellan on Spying

Q: Does the president think he should obey the law? He put his hand on the Bible twice to uphold the Constitution. Wiretapping is not legal under the circumstances without a warrant.

MR. MCCLELLAN: Well, I guess you didn't pay attention to the attorney general's hearing earlier today, because he walked through very clearly the rationale behind this program.

Q There is no rationale --

MR. MCCLELLAN: And Helen, I think you have to ask --

Q -- ( inaudible) -- the law.

MR. MCCLELLAN: I think you have ask are we -- well, he's not -- are we a nation at war.

Q That's not the question.

MR. MCCLELLAN: No, that is the issue here.

Q The question is, the point is, there are means for him to go to -- get a warrant to spy on people.

MR. MCCLELLAN: Enemy surveillance is critical to waging and winning war. It's one of the traditional tools of war.

Q But he says he doesn't have running room --

MR. MCCLELLAN: The attorney general outlined very clearly today how previous administrations have used the same authority --

Q That doesn't make it legal.

MR. MCCLELLAN: -- and cited the same -- and cited the very same authority.

Q (Inaudible) -- they broke the law, that's too bad.

MR. MCCLELLAN: And we're going to continue doing everything we can --

Q You know what happened to Nixon when he broke the law.

MR. MCCLELLAN: -- within our power to protect the American people.

This is a very different circumstance, and you know that.

Q No, I don't.